MEASURING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LARGE SCALE CULTURAL EVENTS: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Dr.sc.soc. Anda Laķe
  • Dr.art. Baiba Tjarve
  • Bc.art. Līga Grīnberga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol7.231

Keywords:

social network analysis, large scale cultural events, European Capital of Culture, impact evaluation, social capital

Abstract

Organisation of large scale or mega cultural events requires not only skilful managerial techniques, but also an integrated evaluation approach taking into account such aspects as the cultural, economic, social, political, and environmental context. Mega cultural events can be characterised by complex objectives, diverse funding sources (EU, public, private), a multilayer structure of planned results and effects. All that obviously encumbers evaluation of mega events. The initiative of the European Capital of Culture is one of major large scale European cultural cooperation projects, taking into consideration its budget and the diversity of its programme that exceeds the scope of any other cultural event. In 2014, Riga was chosen to be one of the European Capitals of Culture. Latvia had recently overcome an economic recession; in this context substantial public investment in culture required an additional focus on evaluating the economic impact of Riga 2014 programme. Research is based on the assumption that social network analysis has a great potential in evaluation of cultural impact, as culture incorporates the very idea of a network through which new ideas and creativity are channelled.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barabasi, A. L. Network Science, 2012. Available: http://barabasilab.neu.edu/networksciencebook/ (viewed 16.11.2014.)

Christopoulos, D. Network Analysis in Social and Political Science: A Short Introduction to Concepts. Available: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/netgov/files/snasyllabi/Dimitris_Christopoulos_Intro.pdf). (viewed 16.11.2014.)

Davies, R. Network Perspectives In The Evalution Of Development Interventions: More Than A Petaphor, 2003. Available: http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/nape.pdf (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Education and Culture DG, Culture Programme, 2010. An International Framework of Good Practice in Research and Delivery of the European Capital of Culture Programme: Key recommendations from the European Capitals of Culture Policy Group (2009–2010). Available:https://www.liv.ac.uk/impacts08/Publications/ECoC_Policy_Group_Framework.pdf (viewed 19.11. 2014.)

Emirbayer, M., Goodwin, J. Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency. The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99, No 6, 1994. Pp. 1411–1454. Available: http://sociology.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/233/ais94.pdf (viewed 18.11.2014.)

Fredericks, K., Carman, J. Using Social Network Analysis in Evaluation. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2013. Available: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2013/rwjf409808 (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Hanneman, R. A., Riddle, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, 2005. Available: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ (viewed 10.11.2014.)

Labadi, S. Impact evaluation of cultural projects in Great Britain: the thirty year Hitch. In: Culture as a tool for development. Challenges of analysis and action. ACTED, 2009. Pp. 206–223.

Martens, K. A. Review of Social Network Analysis in Program Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, No 6, 2006. Pp. 82–84. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/45 (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Mote, J. E., Jordan, G., Hage, J. New directions in the use of network analysis in research and product development evaluation. Research Evaluation, vol. 16, No 3, 2007. Pp. 1–13.

Newman, M. Networks. An Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Nework Analysis and the Social Impact of Cultural Arts Organizations. Oehler, K., Sheppard, S. C., Benjamin, B., etc. North Adams: C3D, 2007. Available: http://web.williams.edu/Economics/ArtsEcon/library/pdfs/NA%20Network%20Paper%20010807.pdf (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Palmer-Rae Associates. Report on European Cities and Capitals of Culture. Part I. Palmer-Rae Associates: Brussels, 2004.

Pratt, A. C. The Cultural Industries Sector: its definition and character from secondary sources on employment and trade, Britain 1984–91. London: London School of Economics, 1997. Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21419/1/The_cultural_industries_sector_-_RPESA_41.pdf (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Reeves, M. Measuring the economic and social impact of the arts: a review. London: the Arts Council of England, 2002. Available: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/documents/publications/340.pdf (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Saccone, D. Development As A Network: A New Perspective To Evaluate Cultural Projects. Tafter journal, 2014, No 67. Available: http://www.tafterjournal.it/2014/01/03/development-as-a-network-a-new-perspective-to-evaluate-cultural-projects/ (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Staber, U. Network Evaluation in Cultural Industries. Industry and Innovation, vol. 15, No 5, 2008. Pp. 569–578. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13662710802374229#.U3mKu_l_uYI (viewed 19.11.2014.)

Throsby, D. Assessing the Impacts of the Cultural Industry. Chicago: Cultural Policy Centre, 2004. Available: https://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/sites/culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/files/Throsby2.pdf (viewed 17.11.2014.)

Downloads

Published

14.11.2022