LATVIAN ARTISTIC FIELD FROM THE ARTISTS’ VIEWPOINT

Authors

  • Mg.sc.pol. Signe Grūbe R

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol16.81

Keywords:

artistic field, painters.

Abstract

The autonomy of artistic field is expressed in the degree to which the artist obeys the laws of action and changes in the field of power and social space. The work of a painter can be directly influenced by other actors in the artistic field, therefore, the opinion of other painters is analysed and compared to their own position in the art space. The purpose of this article is to determine the viewpoint from which a painter sees the Latvian artistic field and himself/herself therein. The study is based on 28 author’s interviews with Latvian painters. The article considers whether painters regard the artistic field as separated from the social space and whether they feel themselves and their colleagues as equal players. The research indicates that the autonomy of the artistic field is not possible. Painters are equal players with other actors in the artistic field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, S. H. (2008). Art Worlds. California: University of California Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Fields of Cultural Production. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Ltd.

Bourdieu, P., Haacke, H. (1995). Free Exchange. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press Ltd.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16th printing.

Bourdieu, P. (2004). Practical sense.

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkley: University of California Press.

Grenfell, M., and Hardy, C. (2007). Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. Berg.

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: First MIT Press paperback edition.

Lamont, M. (1992). Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rothenberg, J. (2014). Sociology Looks at the Arts (Contemporary Sociological Perspectives). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

Tolstoy, I. (1997). What is Art? In: S. Feagin, P. Maynard (eds.) Aesthetics. Oxford: University Press.

Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wacquant, J. D. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology a workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociology Theory, Vol. 7, No 1 (Spring), pp. 26–63.

Downloads

Published

02.11.2022