REFLECTION OF THE PROLETARIAN ART IN THE LEFT-WING PERIODICALS OF THE INTERWAR PERIOD IN LATVIA

Authors

  • Dr.art. Stella Pelše A

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol8.175

Keywords:

proletarian art, left-wing periodicals, Marxism, Activism, Constructivism

Abstract

In the left-wing magazines of the 1920s and 1930s, the visual art has been analysed from variously emphasised left-wing positions; even though, on the whole, literature seemed to be a more important weapon in the ideological battle. “Laikmets” (“Epoch”) (1923) was the least politicised periodical, advocating active, modern art opposed to stagnant bourgeois traditions, and promoting, for instance, the activism of author Andrejs Kurcijs, which was related to the ideas of the French purism. “Domas” (“Thoughts”) (1912–1915; 1924–1934) was a more long-lived periodical, aspiring to be a sophisticated culture magazine with more elaborate essays, such as Kurcijs’s draft for his publication “On Art” and the article “The Sociology of Creativity” by literary scholar Pēteris Birkerts. The highlights of the magazine “Trauksme” (“Alert”) (1928– 1929) included the statement by poet Pēteris Ķikuts about constructivism being more akin to the expressionists’ depth than to the impressionists’ superficial sliding over the surface of life. In “Signāls” (“Signal”) (1928–1930), a publication which was social- democratic in orientation, Voldemārs Branks wrote about art, inspired by the ideas of Leo Tolstoy and Hippolyte Taine, as well as emphasising the importance of the content and the accessibility of art. On the other hand, magazine “Kreisā Fronte” (“Left Front”) (1928–1930), edited by Linards Laicens, was related to the Russian constructivism by calling for the abandonment of the visual art in the name of producing useful things. The coexistence of modernistic, realistic and utilitarian versions echoed the Russian and European art processes of the time with the rehabilitation of mimetic traditions and ideologically motivated discrediting of the avant-garde. With the establishment of the Latvian authoritarian regime in 1934, the era of the leftist magazines in Latvia, which revealed the controversial attempts to display a more progressive outline of art, came to an end.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brasliņa, Aija. Latvian Modernists in Berlin in the 1920s: Impulses and Resonance.

Centropa: A Journal of Central European Architecture and Related Arts, Nr. 12 (3), 2012. Pp. 296–303.

Birkerts, Pēteris. (1924a) Daiļradīšanas zocioloģija. Domas, Nr. 8, 1924. 240.–246. lpp.

Birkerts, Pēteris. (1924b) Daiļradīšanas zocioloģija. Domas, Nr. 9, 1924. 329.–333. lpp.

Branks, Voldemārs. Domas par strādnieku mākslas pamata jautājumiem. Signāls, Nr. 4, 1929. 111.–114. lpp.

Branks, Voldemārs. TA zīmēšanas studijas izstāde. Signāls, Nr. 6, 1930. 234.–238. lpp.

Fraser, James Howard. Publishing and Book Design in Latvia 1919–1940: a Rediscovery. Rīga: Neputns, 2014.

Fross, Emīls. Lietišķā literatūra. Kreisā Fronte, Nr. 3, 1928. 17.–26. lpp.

Kurcijs, Andrejs. (1923a) Aktīvā māksla. Potsdama: Laikmets, 1923.

Kurcijs, Andrejs. (1923b) Aktīvisms. Laikmets, Nr. 1, 1923. 22. lpp.

Kurcijs, Andrejs. Par mākslu. Rīga: Laikmeta izdevums,1932.

Kurcijs, Andrejs. Par mākslu. I. Estētiskā atziņa. Domas, Nr. 8, 1924. 236.–239. lpp.

Ķikuts, Pēteris. Konstruktīvā radīšana. Trauksme, Nr. 1, 1928. 24.–27. lpp.

L. L. Fotogrāfja kreisās kultūras darbā. Kreisā Fronte, Nr. 6, 1928. 37.–39. lpp.

Ładnowska, Janina. Te MUBA and the L’Art Contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna… Avant-Guard Without Borders, pp. 21–27. In: Civinskienė, K. (ed.).

Te International Conference “Mutations”. Dedicated to Antanas Samuolis. Kaunas: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art, 2001.

Nost akademiju! Trauksme, Nr. 4, 1929. 29. lpp.

Pelše, Stella. Andreja Kurcija Aktīvā māksla. No: Ābele, K. (sast.) Latvijas māksla tuvplānos. Rīga: Neputns, 2003. 96.–104. lpp.

Pelše, Stella Grāmatniecība un vāku dizains. Mākslas Vēsture un Teorija, Nr. 17, 2014. 63.–64. lpp.

P. Ķ. [Ķikuts, Pēteris?] Kas ir Muba? Trauksme, Nr. 2, 1928. 29.–30. lpp.

Sudmals, E[mīls]. Plakāts. Kreisā Fronte, Nr. 1, 1928. 24.–26. lpp.

[Tēns, Ipolits 1897] Tēna domas par mākslu. Latviski apstrādājis Vizulis. Rīga: Rīgas Latviešu biedrības Zinību komisijas Derīgu grāmatu apgādāšanas nodaļa.

Брик, Осип. От картины к ситцу. ЛЕФ, Nr. 2 (6), 1924. С. 27.

Толстой, Лев. Что такое искусство? Москва: Современник, 1985

Downloads

Published

13.11.2022