LEFTISM AND NON-NORMATIVE SEXUALITY IN LATVIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Authors

  • Dr.philol. Kārlis Vērdiņš U

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol8.177

Keywords:

Marxism, Friedrich Engels, August Bebel, homosexuality, decadence

Abstract

In the context of the history of the leftist ideas, the relations of their repre- sentatives with the non-normative sexuality have been peculiar and controversial. In the European countries, the attitude of the leftist circles towards the non-normative sexuality was controversial – it was interpreted both as a manifestation of the depravity of the degenerate aristocracy and as a phenomenon to be accepted by the new society, separated from the church and the dogmas of the bourgeois morals. Even before World War I, the polemic opinions of the advocates of the leftist ideas were voiced in the public space of Latvia – a historical explanation of sexuality can be found in the translations of Friedrich Engels and August Bebel; Andrejs Upīts and other local Marxists waged a war against the depravity, including the glorification of sodomy, allegedly found in the so-called decadents’ works, even though nowadays it is difficult to find grounds for such reproaches. On the other hand, among the decadents, there are authors (Haralds Eldgasts, Atis Ķeniņš), who, at least episodically, have propagated the triumph of the new morals and a new literature, when the artist has the right to obtain impressions from the most diverse phenomena, including passions and vices, among them unnatural desire; yet, overall, the use of the non-normative sexuality for mocking and humiliating one’s political and aesthetic adversaries prevails, as during this period, Latvia, unlike Germany or Russia, lacks culture personalities who would become advocates for this kind of sexuality in the public space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bēbelis, Augusts. Sieviete un sociālisms. Tulk. Fr. Roziņš. Rīga: Taurētājs, 1912.

Engelss, Frīdrihs. Ģimenes, īpašuma un valsts celšanās. I daļa. Rīga: M. J. Baļķītis, 1907.

Fähnders, Walter. Anarchism and Homosexuality in Wilhelmine Germany: Senna Hoy,

Erich Mühsam, John Henry Mackay. Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 29 (2–3), 1995. Pp. 117–154.

Hekma, Gert; Oosterhuis, Harry & Steakley, James (eds.). Gay Men and the Sexual History of the Political Left. New York–London: Harrington Park Press, 1995.

Jansons-Brauns, Janis. Fauni vai klauni?: Piezīmes par mūsu jaunāko rakstniecību. Pēterburga: Dzirkstele, 1908.

Kalniņa, Ieva E. & Vērdiņš, Kārlis. Mūsdienu literatūras teorijas. Rīga: LU LFMI, 2013.

Ķeniņš, Atis. Bodlērs un Verlēns. Zalktis, Nr. 1, 1908. 149.–167. lpp.

Landers, Kārlis. Grāmatu galds: Ziemas naktis II. Vārpas, Nr. 4, 1908. 351.–356. lpp.

Neacşu, Dana. Te Wrongful Rejection of Big Teory (Marxism) by Feminism and

Queer Teory: A Brief Debate. Capital University Law Review, vol. 34, 2005. Pp. 125–151.

Rainis, J. Kopoti raksti. 2. sējums: Dzeja. Tekstus sagatavojusi un komentējusi Mirdza Ābola. Rīga: Zinātne, 1977.

Sikora, Tomasz & Majka, Rafal. “Not So Strange Bedfellows”: Considering Queer and Left Alliances in Poland. Dialogue and Universalism, No. 5–6, 2010. Pp. 89–100.

Skalbe, Kārlis (sast.) Ziemas naktis. Rīga: D. Zeltiņš, 1907.

Skalbe, Kārlis. Mūža raksti. 2. sējums. Sast. I. Bērsons. Rīga: Elpa, 2002.

Upīts, Andrejs. Krievu jaunākā rakstniecība. Dzimtenes Vēstnesis, 1909, 8. (21.) augusts.

Vērdiņš, Kārlis & Ozoliņš, Jānis. Zilās identitātes naratīvs postpadomju Latvijā: sociālie aspekti. Dzimtes konstruēšana. Rīga: Avens un partneri, 2013. 111.–128. lpp.

Zinātne un dzīve: ģimenes dzīves attīstība. Darbs. 1906, 7., 11., 12. un 19. janv.

Downloads

Published

13.11.2022