CULTURAL CANON AS A CULTURAL POLICY PROGRAMME: POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL PRECONDITIONS AND PERSPECTIVES OF ITS DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol6.265Keywords:
cultural canon, preconditions for sustainability of the cultural c, political ideology, nationalism, multiculturalismAbstract
This article provides a comparative analysis of the initiative of cultural policy implemented in three countries of the European Union (the Netherlands, Denmark and Latvia) and the term “cultural canon” that is used to characterise it. As the substantiation, objectives, functions and results of the cultural canon as a state-financed programme of cultural policy essentially differ in all the above countries, there is a ground for discussions about the preconditions for the sustainable development of this programme. The main objective of this article is to reveal the significance of political and ideological factors of the cultural canon in the development of cultural policy and the choice of scenarios in the future. In order to reach this objective, the theoretical understanding of the notion “cultural canon” has been analysed and its link with the values of a certain political ideology. A comparative analysis and assessment of the development of cultural canons in theNetherlands, Denmark and Latvia have been carried out by applying data of empirical research that is based on qualitative methodology. The article explores the development scenarios for the cultural canon that would bemost appropriate for the political- ideological context of Latvia. The theoretical basis of this article lies in various investigations that evaluate the cultural canon as substantiation for ideological paradigms in the cultural policy by paying special attention to works of those authors who have analysed the expression of ideological doctrines of nationalism and multiculturalism in culture (Willem Frijhoff, Peter Duelund, Monique Kremer, Will Kymlicka). The conclusions of this article are based on the theoretical and empirical research; they serve as arguments andproof for the thesis that consistent political and ideological support for the initiatives of the cultural canon is considered to be the main factor that influences the development of the programme and sustainability.Downloads
References
Duelund, 2009. P. Duelund. A sense of belonging: paradoxes of identity, nationalism and diversity in Europe and beyond. Identifying with Europe: reflections on a historical andcultural canon for Europe.
Eds. I. van Hamersveld and A. Sonnen. Amsterdam: Boekmanstudies, 2009.
Greiffenhagen, Greiffenhagen, 2002. Handwörterbuch zur politischen Kultur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2. Völlig überarb. und akt. Aufl. Hrsg. M. Greiffenhagen. & S. Greiffenhagen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002.
Hābermāss, 2012. J. Hābermāss. Postnacionālā konstelācija un demokrātijas nākotne. Rīga: Zinātne, 2012.
Klaičs, 2008. D. Klaičs. Iztēle bez robežām. Ceļvedis starptautiskai sadarbībai kultūrā. Rīga: Culturelab, 2008.
Kulturkanon, 2006. Kulturkanon. Kulturministeriet. 2. udg., 1. opl. København: Politikens Forl., 2006.
Kymlicka, 1999. W. Kymlicka. Multikulturalismus und Demokratie: űber Minderheiten in Staaten und Nationen. Hrsg. von O. Kallscheuer. Hamburg: Rotbuch Verlag, 1999.
Kruks, 2013. S. Kruks. Kultūras kanons. Mūsdienu kultūras stāvokļi/Conditions for Contemporary Culture. Riga. Red. O. Redbergs. Rīga: Megaphone Publishers, 2013. – 50.– 51. lpp.
Laķe, Hermane, Tjarve, 2013. A. Laķe, A. Hermane, B. Tjarve. Latvijas kultūras kanona veidošanas metodoloģiskie kritēriji un principi. Vienotu Latvijas Kultūras kanona veidošanas metodoloģisko principu un kritēriju noteikšana. Novērtējuma pētījums. Rīga: biedrība “Culturelab”; Latvijas Kultūra akadēmija, 2013.
Landes, 2013. H. Landes. Multikulturālisms: kritiskā perspektīve. Mūsdienu kultūras stāvokļi/Conditions for Contemporary Culture. Riga. Red. O. Redbergs. Rīga: Megaphone Publishers, 2013.
Muižnieks, 2013. N. Muižnieks. Es labprātāk redzu tādu Latviju, kurā cilvēki grib iebraukt, nevis izbraukt. Jurista Vārds. 2013. Nr. 5 (756).
Streļča, 2013. I. Streļča. Latvijas un Dānijas kultūras kanonu salīdzinājums: mērķi, izveide un rezultāts. Bakalaura darbs. Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija, 2013.
Кимлика, 2010. У. Кимлика. Современная политическая философия. Введение. Москва: Изд. дом Гос. ун-та – Высш. шк. Экономики, 2010.
Рыжакова, 2010. С. И. Рыжакова. Historica Lettica: национальная история и этническая идентичность: о конструировании и культурном реферировании прошлого латышей. Москва: Институт этнологии и антропологии, 2010.
Рыжакова, 2011. С. И. Рыжакова. Каноны национальных культур: опыты Голландии, Дании и Латвии 2000–х годов. Этнографическое обозрение. № 3. – C. 76 – 88.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.