DIGITALIZING THE PERFORMING ARTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN LATVIA: TRANSFORMATIONOR SURVIVAL TACTICS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol24.411Keywords:
COVID-19 pandemic, performative arts, theatre industry, digital transformation, social connectedness, sense of presence, simultaneity, “liveness”Abstract
The article seeks to answer the question of whether the transformation and acceleration of digital content in performing arts during the COVID-19 pandemic are determined situatively or are a naturally stable trend initiated by the development of ICT. It focuses on the theatre industry in order to understand whether theatre performances in the digital environment and the use of digital elements in performing arts do not create a confrontation with the necessary sense of physical presence.
The research data showed that the practices of using digital environment elements and digital technologies in the creation of theatre performances were both 1) a short-term solution, as it allowed staging a play, working with actors remotely, as well as creating products that are available to the audience in conditions of distancing requirements, and 2) gave an acceleration to the spread of digital innovations in the theatre industry in general, which was especially manifested in the works of directors who are open to the search for new experimental forms and the ambition of artistic excellence in theatre art, thus generating a long-term development potential. On the one hand, the sense of presence, including physical presence and simultaneity, is still recognized as the most essential feature of theatre and also a certain measure of quality. On the other hand, it is recognized that the possibilities of digital solutions, including artificial intelligence and other technological resources, may also change and erase the boundaries between the real and digital environments in performing arts as well.
Downloads
References
Auslander, P. (2008). Liveness. Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge.
Auslander, P. (2012). Digital liveness: A Historico-philosophical perspective. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, No. 34 (3), pp. 3–11.
Auslander, P., Es, K., Hartmann, M. (2019). A Dialogue About Liveness. In: M. Hartmann, E. Prommer, K. Deckner, S. O. Görland (eds.). Mediated Time Perspectives on Time in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 275–296.
Bel, D., Smolders, K., Ijsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y. (2009). Social connectedness: Concept and measurement. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Environments. Barcelona (Spain): IOS Press, pp. 67–74. Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220992602_Social_connectedness_Concept_and_measurement (viewed 10.05.2022.)
Berger, N. (2020). The Forgotten Art of Assembly. Or, Why Theatre Makers Should Stop Making. Available:https://medium.com/@nicholasberger/the-forgotten-art-of-assembly-a94e164edf0f (viewed 10.04.2022.)
Bissel, L., Weir, L. (2022). Performance in a Pandemic. Routledge.
Bowins, B. (2021). States and Processes for Mental Health. Advancing Psychotherapy Effectiveness. Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 41–48.
Bradbury, A, Warran, K., Mak, H. W., Fancourt, D. (2021). The Role of the Arts during the COVID-19 Pandemic. London’s Global University.
Brennen, J. S., Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–11.
Čakare, V. (2020). Kā ar Šekspīru? SATORI. Available: https://satori.lv/article/ka-ar-sekspiru (viewed 10.04.2022.)
Deitz, R. L., Hellerstein, L. H., St. George, S. M., et al. (2020). A qualitative study of social connectedness and its relationship to community health programs in rural Chiapas, Mexico. BMC Public Health 20, Article number: 852. Available:https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-09008-6 (viewed 10.04.2022.)
Etchells, T., Giannachi, G., Kaye, N. (2012). Looking back: a conversation about presence, 2006. In: G. Giannachi, N. Kaye, M. Shanks (eds.). Archaeologies of Presence. Art, performance and the persistence of being. Routledge.
Ford, V., Mandviwalla, M. (2020). Can Digital Engagement Transform the Performing Arts? Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339025143_Can_Digital_Engagement_Transform_the_Performing_Arts#fullTextFileContent (viewed 17.02.2023.)
Frigotto, M. L., Young, M., Pinheiro, R. (2022). Resilience in Organizations and Societies: The State of the Art and Three Organizing Principles for Moving Forward. In: R. Pinheiro, M. L. Frigotto, M. Young (eds.). Towards Resilient Organizations and Societies. A Cross-Sectoral and Multi-Disciplinary Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–40. Available: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/51963/978-3-030-82072-5.pdf?sequence=1#page=30; (viewed 15.04.2023.)
Giannachi, G., Kaye, N. (2017). Performing presence. Between the live and the simulated. Manchester University Press.
Giannachi, G. (2012). Environmental presence. In: G. Giannachi, N. Kaye, M. Shanks (eds.). Archaeologies of Presence. Art, performance and the persistence of being. Routledge.
Houlihan, B., Morris, C. (2022). Introduction – performing in digital in the COVID-19 era, Research in Drama Education. The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, Volume 27:2, pp. 157–167.
Hylland, O. M. (2021). Tales of temporary disruption: Digital adaptations in the first 100 days of the cultural Covid lockdown. Poetics, Volume 90. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X21000929 (viewed 15.04.2022.)
Keišs, A. (2020). Kultūra šajā laikā ir milzīga, absolūti A klases nepieciešamība. TVNET. Available: https://sejas.tvnet.lv/6945085/paliecmajas-keiss-kultura-saja-laika-ir-milziga-absoluti-a-klases-nepieciesamiba (viewed 15.04.2022.)
Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford University Press.
Laķe, A., et al. (2022). Kultūras aktivitātes barometrs 2022. Kultūras patēriņa un līdzdalības ietekmes pētījums. Available:https://www.km.gov.lv/sites/km/files/media_file/kulturas-barometrs_2022_petijums.pdf (viewed 26.01.2023.)
Latvijas Jaunā teātra institūts (2023). Teātri un neatkarīgas kompānijas. Available: http://www.theatre.lv/index2.php?parent=43 (viewed 15.04.2023.)
Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija (2020). Covid-19 pandēmijas ietekme uz kultūras nozari. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MPAQjNl5tdgxvBKq9qLoy3g26ItBVlw5/view?pli=1 (viewed 15.04.2022.)
Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija, SIA “Analītisko pētījumu un stratēģiju laboratorija”, SIA “SKDS” (2020). Kultūras patēriņa un līdzdalības ietekmes pētījums. Pētījuma rezultātu ziņojums. Latvijas Republikas Kultūras ministrija. Available: https://www.km.gov.lv/lv/media/11801/download (viewed 15.04.2022.)
Latvijas Nacionālais kultūras centrs (2022). Programma “Latvijas skolas soma”. Available: https://www.lnkc.gov.lv/lv/par-programmu-latvijas-skolas-soma (viewed 10.02.2023.)
Lee, R. M., Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, No. 42 (2), pp. 232–241.
Lēvalde, V. (2020). Latvian Theatre in the Digital Age. // L. Mellēna-Bartkeviča (ed.). Contemporary Latvian Theatre. Zinātne, pp. 36–49.
Mak, H. W., Fluharty, M., Fancourt, D. (2021). Predictors and Impact of Arts Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analyses of Data From 19,384 Adults in the COVID-19 Social Study. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 12. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626263/full (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Mastrominico, M. (2020). Live or Alive: A Reflection on Performance Practice in Pandemic (Digital) Times. Available:https://www.qmu.ac.uk/campus-life/blogs/bianca-mastrominico/live-or-alive-a-reflection-on-performance-practice-inpandemic-digital-times/ (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Okabe-Miyamoto, K., Lyubomirsky, S. (2021). Social Connection and Well-Being during COVID-19. World Happiness Report. Available: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/social-connection-and-well-being-during-covid-19/#fnref2 (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Ottone, E. (2020). In moments of crisis, people need culture. UNESCO news. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/moments-crisis-people-need-culture? (viewed 03.02.2023.)
Perkins, R., Mason-Bertrand, A., Tymoszuk, U., et al. (2021). Arts engagement supports social connectedness in adulthood: findings from the HEartS Survey. BMC Public Health, No. 21. Available: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11233-6#citeas (viewed 15.04.2022.)
Phelan, P. (1998). The ontology of performance: representation without reproduction. Unmarked. The Politics of Performance. Routledge.
Radermecker, A-S. V. (2020). Art and culture in the COVID-19 era: for a consumer-oriented approach. SN Business & Economics, Volume 1. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43546-020-00003-y (viewed 20.03.2022.)
Rieksta-Ķenģe, N. (2020). Vai uz virtuālās skatuves iespējams teātris? Pandēmijas laika izrādes vērtē kritiķi. Delfi Kultūra, 19.05.2020. Available: https://www.delfi.lv/kultura/news/theatre/vai-uz-virtualas-skatuves-iespejams-teatris-pandemijas-laika-izrades-verte-kritiki.d?id=52149769 (viewed 19.03.2022.)
Rutkēviča, A. (2020). Teātris dzīvē un ekrānos. Saruna par izrādi “Vienaldzības gadsimts” un virtuālo vidi. Teātra Vēstnesis, 2020/II (138). Available: https://teatravestnesis.lv/article/91-teatris-dzive-un-ekranos (viewed 17.03.2022.)
Sherman, J. F. (2013). Performing Presence: Between the Live and the Simulated by Gabriella Giannachi and Nick Kaye, and:Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being ed. by Gabriella Giannachi, Nick Kaye, and Michael Shanks. Theatre Journal 65 (3), pp. 437–438.
Struka, I. (2022). Īsa teātra vēsture. Available: https://enciklopedija.lv/skirklis/21722-teātris-Latvijā (viewed 12.04.2022.)
Svarinska, M. (2020). Jaunā teātra dzimšana. Kroders. Recenzijas. Available: https://www.kroders.lv/recenzijas/1442 (viewed 15.02.2022.)
Swarbrick, D., Seibt, B., Grinspun, N., Vuoskoski, J. K. (2021). Corona Concerts: The Effect of Virtual Concert Characteristics on Social Connection and Kama Muta. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 12. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648448/full (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Tišheizere, E. (2020). Gaisma ir iekšpusē. Saruna par ekrāna specifiku un ne tikai par to. Ar Artūru Skrastiņu, Orestu Silabriedi un Armandu Zvirbuli. Teātra Vēstnesis. Available: https://teatravestnesis.lv/article/97-gaisma-ir-iekspuse (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Troilo, G. (2017). Marketing in creative industries: value, experience and creativity. Palgrave. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 54–73.
Ulberte, L. (2020). Attālinātās sērošanas anatomija. Teātris virtuālajā vidē. Teātra Vēstnesis, No. 2 (138). Available:https://teatravestnesis.lv/article/100-attalinatas-serosanas-anatomija (viewed 15.03.2022.)
WHO (2020). Risk Communication and Community Engagement Guidance for Physical and Social Distancing. Available:https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/Covid-19/Techinical%20documents/Risk%20Communication%20and%20Community%20Engagement%20Guidance%20for%20Physical%20and%20Social%20Distancing.pdf (viewed 15.03.2022.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.