CULTURAL AND ARTS CONSUMPTION AS A SOURCE OF SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: THE CASE OF THE LATVIAN CENTENARY PROGRAMME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol23.447Keywords:
cultural participation, arts consumption, social solidarity, social inequality, ethnic groupsAbstract
In 2017–2021, Latvia celebrated its centenary with a wide-ranging cultural programme. The Centenary programme was announced as “the biggest event in the history of modern Latvia” providing 22.3 million euros over three years for more than 800 festive events “to strengthen the spirit of nationhood and a sense of belonging amongst the people of Latvia, and to promote collaboration and self-organization within the community” [Ministry of Culture 2020]. In this paper, we explore the ways in which this cultural policy initiative worked as a form of social solidarity building in the Latvian society, where there is a large Russian-speaking community. We are interested in examining the public’s participation and perceptions of the Centenary cultural programme, focusing specifically on the differing patterns and effects in the Latvian and Russian-speaking communities. The analysis draws primarily on a representative survey, designed and conducted in the autumn of 2021 by the authors as part of a larger research project. The survey was designed to enable analysis of the perceptions of the Centenary programme, participation and consumption patterns among different social groups and cultural communities, and experiences and perceptions of social solidarity (or lack thereof) in the context of the Centenary programme. The survey has provided new data on the links between cultural and arts consumption practices in an ethnically diverse society, as well as on the perceptions of effects of arts consumption on social solidarity and sense of belonging. On the basis of quantitative analysis of the survey data, we study the patterns of cultural consumption and its social impact, given the ethnic diversity of the society in question. We explore, firstly, how cultural and arts consumption is influenced by ethnic belonging and, secondly, how the effects of this consumption differ among ethnic groups. Based on this empirical analysis, the paper contributes to the wider, ongoing interdisciplinary debates on cultural and arts consumption, societal diversity and inclusion. Furthermore, the paper offers a novel approach to exploring, both theoretically and empirically, the effects of cultural and arts consumption on social solidarity.
Downloads
References
Alacovska, A. (2020). From Passion to Compassion: A Caring Inquiry into Creative Work as Socially Engaged Art. Sociology, 54 (4), pp. 1–18.
Allen, K., Friedman, S., O’Brien, D., and Saha, A. (2017). Producing and Consuming Inequality: A Cultural Sociology of the Cultural Industries. Cultural Sociology, 11 (3): pp. 271–282.
Banks, P. A. (2010). Black cultural advancement: racial identity and participation in the arts among the black middle class. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33 (2): pp. 272–289.
Banks, P. A. (2017). Ethnicity, Class and Trusteeship at African-American and Mainstream Museums. Cultural Sociology, 11(1): pp. 97–112.
Belfiore, E. (2020). Whose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26 (3): pp. 383–397.
Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., and Wright, D. (2009). Culture, Class, Distinction. London and New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: R. K. Brown (ed). Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change: Papers in the Sociology of Education. London: Tavistock, pp. 71–84.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brook, O., O’Brien, D., and Taylor, M. (2020). Culture Is Bad for You. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bull, A., and Scharff, C. (2017). ‘McDonald’s music’ versus ‘serious music’: How production and consumption practices help to reproduce class inequality in the classical music profession. Cultural Sociology, 11 (3): pp. 283–301.
Calhoun, C. (2007). Nationalism and Cultures of Democracy. Public Culture, 19 (1): pp. 151–173.
Chan, T. W., and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption. European Sociological Review, 23 (1): pp. 1–19.
Friedman, S., Savage, M., Hanquinet, L., and Andre, M. (2015). Cultural Sociology and New Forms of Distinction. Poetics, 53: pp. 1–8.
Howard, F. (2022). Artistic Production and (Re) production: Youth Arts Programmes as Enablers of Common Cultural Dispositions. Cultural Sociology. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211066371
Katz-Gerro, T. (2002). Highbrow cultural consumption and class distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Social Forces, 81, pp. 207–229.
Katz-Gerro, T., Raz, S., and Yaish, M. (2009). How do class, status, ethnicity, and religiosity shape cultural omnivorousness in Israel? Journal of Cultural Economics, 33 (1): pp. 1–17.
Kondo, D. (2018). World-Making: Race, Performance, and the Work of Creativity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Lamont, M., and Molnar, V. (2001). How blacks use consumption to shape their collective identity: evidence from African-American marketing specialists. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1, pp. 31–45.
Lynch, K., and Kalaitzake, M. (2018). Affective and calculative solidarity: the impact of individualism and neoliberal capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 23 (2): pp. 238–257.
Meghji, A. (2020). Contesting racism: how do the black middle-class use cultural consumption for anti-racism? Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 27 (5): pp. 595–613.
Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Latvia (2020). “Centenary of the Republic of Latvia”. Available: https://www.km.gov.lv/en/centenary-republic-latvia (viewed 13.09.2021.)
Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Patterson, N. D. (2020). Who Goes to Shows? Race-ethnicity and the Visual and Performing Arts. Cultural Sociology, 14 (1): pp. 22–41.
Saha, A. (2017). Race and the Cultural Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Van Wel, F., Couwenbergh-Soeterboek, N., Couwenbergh, C., ter Bogt, T., et al. (2006). Ethnicity, youth cultural participation, and cultural reproduction in the Netherlands. Poetics, 34: pp. 65–82.
Wallace, D. (2017). Cultural capital as whiteness? Examining logics of ethno-racial representation and resistance. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39 (4): pp. 466–482.
Warren, S., and Jones, P. (2018). Cultural policy, governance and urban diversity: resident perspectives from Birmingham, UK. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 109 (1): pp. 22–35.
Wilson, N., Gross, J., and Bull, A. (2017). Towards Cultural Democracy: Promoting Cultural Capabilities for Everyone. Available: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/cultural/resources/reports/towards-cultural-democracy-2017-kcl.pdf (viewed 03.06.2022.)
Yaish, M., and Katz-Gerro, T. (2012). Disentangling ‘cultural capital’: The consequences of cultural and economic resources for taste and consumption. European Sociological Review, 28 (2): pp. 169–185.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
